Images in this article
Juurlink said he doesn’t think a correction is sufficient for this case in particular. “The paper should obviously be retracted,” he told us. “It’s a fictional case portrayed as real and its scientific underpinnings have collapsed, yet it perpetuates them.”
。关于这个话题，体育直播提供了深入分析
“No one wants to read a 7-inch-long unformatted message when an organized attachment would have worked better,” the American etiquette experts at The Emily Post Institute, advised in a blog post on business communications.
FT Videos & Podcasts